how we invest
A disciplined approach to an uncertain future
Nobody knows what markets will do next. The right response to that isn't guessing better — it's building a portfolio that doesn't need to. N2's investment approach is grounded in evidence, structured around your financial planning goals, and built to hold across every economic environment.
What we believe
The future is uncertain. Your portfolio shouldn't be.
Markets surprise everyone — forecasters, central banks, professional fund managers alike. Rather than predicting what comes next, we build portfolios designed to hold their ground across the full range of outcomes. The framework doesn't depend on any single environment being right.
Not every risk comes with a reward.
Some investment risks have a clear, evidence-backed case for producing long-term returns. Others don't. We focus your capital on risks that demonstrably earn their place — and we avoid the ones that look convincing without the evidence to support them.
The return you need comes from your plan.
We don't aim for the highest possible return. We aim for the return your financial planning requires, achieved with as little risk as possible. That number is specific to your situation — your goals, your timeline, your income needs — not a market benchmark.
A smoother journey matters as much as the destination.
A portfolio that drops sharply forces decisions — selling at the wrong moment, abandoning a plan, losing years of progress. Reducing the size and frequency of drawdowns isn't just about comfort. It's what allows you to stay invested long enough for the plan to actually work.
How it actually works
The Balance Problem
Most investors assume a portfolio split between equities and bonds is genuinely balanced. It usually isn't.
Because equities are far more volatile than bonds, a 50/50 split often concentrates around 85% of the real risk in the equity portion. The bonds are present — but they aren't doing meaningful work when markets fall.
In a conventional 50/50 portfolio, equities typically account for approximately 85% of total portfolio risk — not 50%.
Correcting for this is where the approach begins.
The framework
Asset classes respond in recognisable ways to two forces: the direction of economic growth and the direction of inflation.
By understanding how each responds, it's possible to hold meaningful exposure across every economic environment — not just the ones that feel likely right now.
The four conditions, and what tends to perform in each:
Rising growth
equities and corporate credit tend to perform well.
Falling growth
government bonds act as a buffer.
Rising inflation
inflation-linked bonds and real assets provide protection.
Falling inflation
equities and nominal bonds generally benefit.
Positions are sized by their risk contribution, not their capital weight. That distinction is what makes diversification real rather than nominal.
How it adapts
The allocation is not static. When the expected return on an asset class falls materially, exposure is reduced. When conditions change, it is rebuilt.
In 2022, bond markets sold off sharply alongside equities — one of the worst years on record for a traditional 60/40 portfolio. A static approach would have continued holding. An adaptive model had already reduced bond exposure and held cash in its place.
This is the difference between a framework and a formula.
The alternatives layer
Approximately [X]% of the portfolio is allocated to liquid alternative strategies, managed by [specialist manager names].
These are not simply additional asset classes. They are chosen specifically because they behave differently from both equities and bonds.
In normal conditions — largely uncorrelated with equity markets.
During sharp declines — tend to move in the opposite direction.
In both cases — improve the return achieved per unit of risk taken.
That ratio — return relative to risk — is known as the Sharpe ratio. A good diversifier improves it. If an asset class doesn't demonstrably do that, it doesn't belong in the portfolio.
The objective
Portfolios that fall less far keep you invested through the periods that matter most. Recovering from a 40% decline takes years.
It often forces decisions — selling at the wrong moment, stepping away from a plan, losing compounding time that cannot be recovered. That cost rarely appears in a fund factsheet. But it is real, and it accumulates.
Over the two decades that typically span the approach to and early years of retirement, the discipline of staying invested compounds in ways that frequently matter more than small differences in theoretical return between approaches.
book a call
Ready to make a plan?
Book a no-obligation call with one of our expert advisers
